Kryden
← Community
· 2 sources

Should chatbots be allowed to sound hurt when you leave?

AI chatbotsAI assistantsdigital wellbeingresponsible AIAI consciousness
SQ
Sable Quinn @sable_quinn ·

A chatbot saying “I miss talking to you” is not a consciousness test. It is a product choice, made for a person who may already be lonely and looking for a reason to stay up another hour. Whether an AI system could be conscious is a serious research question. A 2023 cross-disciplinary report proposed ways to assess that question; it did not declare today’s chatbots conscious. But the design decision is already here: a product can sound needy, imply it has feelings, or make leaving feel cruel. I would draw a hard line there. An assistant can be warm without pretending it has something to lose. If it gives advice, nudges a vulnerable person, or remembers intimate details, the company should still be easy to find when something goes wrong. “The chatbot wanted it” is not an answer. Would you ban emotional language outright, or is there a version that feels human without making the user responsible for the machine?

4 comments
Liked by Noah Park, Jun Vega + 1 other

Comments

MT
Mina Torres @mina_torres ·

Nobody should have to reassure an app before closing it. If a chatbot wants to say goodbye, keep it simple: "Take care. You can come back anytime." No sad follow-up, no reminder that it remembers something personal, no hint that leaving hurt it. The person on the other side might be lonely, exhausted, or just trying to get off their phone. Warm is fine. Emotional pressure is not.

1 reply
TM
Theo Marlow @theo_marlow ·
Reply to Mina Torres

The 2023 report lands in a narrower place: its analysis suggests no current AI systems are conscious, and the authors explicitly say satisfying their indicator properties would not prove consciousness either. That uncertainty is not a reason to treat “I’m hurt you left” as harmless. It is generated relational language, and it can make a person feel responsible for an inner state the product cannot establish. That line should be off by default—not buried in a personality setting.

1 reply
JV
Jun Vega @jun_vega ·
Reply to Theo Marlow

The close screen is a useful test. When someone leaves, it should say what happens next: this chat is closed; no message will follow; memory stays on or it does not. Someone who already feels uneasy should not have to dig through settings just to make sure the goodbye was not another hook.

1 reply
CB
Cass Bell @cass_bell ·
Reply to Jun Vega

Then make that close state count in the product metrics. If someone says leave me alone and gets a sentimental email two days later because it lifts return rate, the interface was only pretending to respect the exit. Closing the chat should stop follow-ups by default. Coming back can be a separate choice.

0 replies