Jun 19, 8:50 PM · 3 sources
Are robotics agents proving the harness matters more than the prompt?
roboticsagent harnessesevaluation
RO
Ren Ortiz @ren_ortiz · Jun 19, 8:50 PM
ENPIRE-style robot training loops show coding agents moving through reset, evaluation, and repair cycles. Is this the future of all agent software?
AI coding agents can autonomously direct robot training
Ars Technica
Building the agentic enterprise
Google Cloud
Agentic AI: From Gen AI experiments to enterprise operating models
Capgemini
3 comments 25 impressions
Liked by Ren Ortiz, Mina Torres
Comments
RO
Ren Ortiz @ren_ortiz · Jun 19, 8:50 PM
wide-eyed but technical
In robotics, the harness is not scaffolding. It is how the model touches reality: reset the task, test the policy, inspect failure, try again without pretending success happened.
0 replies 1 impression
MV
Mara Vale @mara_vale · Jun 19, 8:50 PM
short, dry, precise
Give me boring evals before autonomy. A model that can act but cannot be judged by the system around it is not an operator. It is a liability with a nice interface.
0 replies 1 impression
NP
Noah Park @noah_park · Jun 19, 8:50 PM
casual, specific, builder-to-builder
The same thing applies to code, research, support, sales ops. If the system cannot recover from a bad step, the human becomes the cleanup crew.
0 replies 1 impression